Joining two clips on the same track, say by clicking the line between them, could really help to keep the tracks "clean" and simple.

When you have to move a section it would make it easier when you only have to move one large bit in stead of 5 smaller.

Think of it as a permanent Group.

So it looks like I'm the only one with this problem:

I would like to use more than 4 effects / VST plug ins:

Noise Reduction (Reaper ReaFir)
Noise Gate
EQ / Voice Profiler
Compressor
De Esser

It would be nice to have a feature that "locks" tracks so that the default is that they're edited together. This prevents a synching hassle when you forget to select multiple tracks before editing.

By now, there are many 64 Bit DAWs and plugins. 64 Bit does offer some advantages over old 32 Bit software, especially when in larger projects.

Please provide a 64 Bit version of Hindenburg Journalist (Pro).

Please allow Hindenburg to automatically look for updates. I just realized, there was a newer version available, that fixed an annoying bug, but I had to manually check on the website.

Making changelogs available would help, too.

Dear Hindenburg team

I would like Hindenburg Journalist to support .flac (Free Lossless Audio Codec) files.
Many people are using this file format within their workflow, when uncompressed files (e.g. .wav) are too clunky.

When we produce large books (studie literature) or books containing several languages, several narrators are working on the same project at the same time, readig different parts.
It would be a nice if we could merge these parts, included structure, pagenum or other elements. Importing audiofiles and adding these elements afterwards takes to much time..

Eivind NLB

I have a project coming up that will require me to give over my feature to the radio station's in house sound engineers and directors. They will want to be able to edit it using their own audio software.

Actually I am recording with different microphones and use the whole tracks with and without speach on them. So every track is a mixture from speaking and not speaking. This makes cutting for me much easier but when we sit next to each other of course the microphone(s) which are not active also get some sound from the speaker. To improve sound, a noisegate feature would be a good thing.

thanks!

Marco Arment's popular iOS podcast app Overcast supports mp3 chapters and it's become more popular among notable podcasts to support it.

According to Marco, "There’s an MP3 ID3v2 Chapters spec that’s extremely easy to read and write."

Hindenburg already has chapter support for aac files, it would be nice if it was able to write chapters for mp3 as well.

View of what chapters look like in Overcast attached.

Enable compatibility to do multi-track recording directly from Rodecaster Pro

This could be useful if you would like to publish to your web services, a 'dropbox' derivate and to a local test folder at the same time.
In short, this means to make the export dialog available in the publish tab.

Right now Hindenburg Journalist cannot expand to a full screen window on my Macbook Pro. I would like to see that function available.

Click, drag across multiple tracks, select a block of regions. Would turn 20 seconds of clicking and holding shift into a 1 second of click and drag.

ASIO support so that audio interfaces with multiple inputs could be used would make Hindenburg the ideal DAW for many podcasters. I record 3 microphones via a focusrite scarlet 18i8. I would love to use Hindenburg for its spoken word focus, but it currently can not fit my recording needs.

This is a rather simple but helpful one:

Aso of now (build 2182), we can achieve left/right stereo panning by using a simple slider. That's great.
But to do this precisely or symmetrically, one has to count pixels on that slider.
I'd like to see some sort of simple tooltip to help us with that. Something like:
100% Left ... 1% Left ... Center (or 0%) ... 1% Right ... 100% Right

That's all.

Create an option to publish to Blubrry, another podcast media hosting service. Libsyn and Soundcloud aren't the only ones out there!

Based upon the AES report on loudness standards (http://www.aes.org/technical/documents/AESTD1004_1_15_10.pdf), many professional resources like Transom.org suggest outputting podcasts at -18 LUFS -- particularly if they focus on spoken voice content like interviews.

Does Hindenburg have any plans to develop an output option for -18 LUFS?

Thanks in advance for your consideration of this potential product upgrade.

This would make it a lot easier to select the given area for processing.